CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-3.5-turboOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 63/100 | 80/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GPT-3.5-turbo | 0/100 — Reasoning not supported | 6/100 | 55/100 | 7/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 — Tool calling not supported |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
16K
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.27/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Output
$1.08/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0054/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.1M
0
Completed sessions
19,011,617
3
Token share
14.9%
0%
Tokens
129T+100%
00%
AUG 6SEP 30
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
58.4%102K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGPT-3.5-turbo vs Jamba MiniGPT-3.5-turbo·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGPT-3.5-turbo vs Jamba LargeGPT-3.5-turbo·Jamba Large