CompareAI models
- Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
- MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max | 87/100 | 100/100 | 30/100 | 80/100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 15/100 | 73/100 | 62/100 | 92/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$0.94/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
166K
152K
Completed sessions
388,389
429,084
Token share
0.04%
0.18%
Tokens
361B+1,157%
1.6T-29%
AUG 6SEP 30
AUG 6SEP 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
42.4%9.1K user-weeks
60.1%6.8K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.